Key Data Set Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location | BR | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geographical representativeness description | Data for Brazil used for Center-South Region. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference year | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General comment on data set | This dataset represents melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF) resin production (solid state of 65% and molar ratio of 1.35), for indoor/outdoor use at wood-based panels industry. The processes starts from reception of raw materials at the factory gate. Includes the inputs to the production processes and the main process emissions to air, water and soil. Transport activities for inputs and capital goods, such as industrial machinery, as well as personnel activities were not included within the system boundary. The reference flow was the production of 1 kg of resin, and dataset was based on primary and secondary data for amino resins. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owner of data set | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quantitative reference | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference flow(s) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time representativeness | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data set valid until | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time representativeness description | Data from 2012 to 2013, current technology for production of amino resins in Brazil (see 'Technology'). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technological representativeness | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Technology description including background system | A Brazilian MUF resin industrial unit with an annual production volume of 17,000,000 tons (2011-2012) and considered a state-of the-art company was selected for this study. This company is a market leader in the amino resins market, with a 30% marketshare in Brazil. The MUF resin production depends on the reaction of urea, melamine and formaldehyde in a three-step process (Dunky, 1998): the first step is methylolation, the second step is condensation and the third step adds the final urea and melamine. The process begins with the conversion of methanol by catalytic oxidation in a reactor vessel for the obtaining of an aqueous form of formaldehyde, which is cooled and sent to the absorber with water for the production of an aqueous solution. Formaldehyde is then sent to a resin batch reactor, where it is mixed with a combination of urea and melamine. It was assumed 10% of melamine with UF resin (neat resin basis). Other inputs, such as small quantities of catalysts and additives, namely sodium hydroxide and formic acid are also used during the process. This reaction is controlled by parameters such as pH, temperature, viscosity, ratio of formaldehyde to urea, and charging rate until the desired degree of polymerization is achieved. Water can also be removed for the control of the percentage of resin solids, but most of the water is usually recycled for re-use in the manufacturing process. Many production facilities, as emission controllers are employed so as to reduce local emissions (e.g., free formaldehyde and particulate matter) in the production of resins. Therefore, it is considered that few emissions are generated in the resin industrial production. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mathematical model | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LCI method and allocation | |
Type of data set | Unit process, black box |
LCI Method Principle | Other |
Deviation from LCI method principle / explanations | Attributional |
Modelling constants | The LCI is entirely done with an attributional methodology. No allocation or substitution methods have been considered in the process. |
Data sources, treatment and representativeness | |
Data cut-off and completeness principles | It was assumed 1 % of the total mass of material resources consumed as cutoff criterion for the LCI construction. |
Deviation from data cut-off and completeness principles / explanations | None. |
Data selection and combination principles | All the input/output data was collected for the Brazilian Center-South region as it accounts for more than 30% of the national production of amino resins in the country. Data for 01 company, located in the States of Minas Gerais was collected. |
Deviation from data selection and combination principles / explanations | None. |
Data treatment and extrapolations principles | see 'Geography' and 'Technology' in 'General information' section. |
Data source(s) used for this data set | |
Sampling procedure | Average values representing one year of MUF resin production were obtained from on-site measurements and internal companies documents such as records of raw material consumption, emissions and waste management inventories. When process input/output data was not avaiable, secondary data were used from literature - Wilson (2009). |
Data collection period | The data was collected during 2 years of sampling between 01/2012-12/2013. |
Completeness | |
Completeness of product model | No statement |
Commissioner and goal | |
Project | SILVA, D.A.L. (2012). Life cycle assessment of MDP wood-based panel production in Brazil. 207p. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos, 2012 (in Portuguese). |
Intended applications | This LCI can be used for any types of LCA studies. |
Data generator | |
Data set generator / modeller | |
Data entry by | |
Time stamp (last saved) | 2021-01-19T16:34:24.735-02:00 |
Data set format(s) | |
Data entry by | |
Publication and ownership | |
UUID | 43a37de0-55c6-409e-be5a-7e9c28099f0c |
Date of last revision | 2020-05-13T13:44:47.614-03:00 |
Data set version | 00.00.009 |
Unchanged re-publication of | |
Owner of data set | |
Copyright | No |
Access and use restrictions | The data set can be used free of charge by anybody to perform LCA studies, to distribute it to third parties, to convert it to other formats, to develop own data sets etc. |
Inputs
Type of flow | Classification | Flow | Variable | Mean amount | Resulting amount | Minimum amount | Maximum amount |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product flow | Energy carriers and technologies / Electricity | 0.045 MJ | 0.045 MJ | ||||
Elementary flow | AGRIBALYSE / Elementary flows / water / river | 7.0E-5 kg | 7.0E-5 kg | ||||
Product flow | 5.0E-5 kg | 5.0E-5 kg | |||||
Product flow | Valuable substances / Materials / Plastics | 0.1 kg | 0.1 kg | ||||
Product flow | chemicals / organics | 0.16 kg | 0.16 kg | ||||
Product flow | 0.39 kg | 0.39 kg | |||||
Product flow | water supply / production | 0.23 kg | 0.23 kg |
Outputs
Type of flow | Classification | Flow | Variable | Mean amount | Resulting amount | Minimum amount | Maximum amount | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product flow | 1.0 kg | 1.0 kg | |||||||
| |||||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / Emission to water / unspecified | 1.3E-4 kg | 1.3E-4 kg | ||||||
| |||||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / Emission to water / fossil- | 6.662E-4 kg | 6.662E-4 kg | ||||||
| |||||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / Emission to air / unspecified | 2.26E-5 kg | 2.26E-5 kg | ||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / air / unspecified | 8.9E-6 kg | 8.9E-6 kg | ||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / water / unspecified | 7.84E-5 kg | 7.84E-5 kg | ||||||
| |||||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / Emission to air / unspecified | 4.0E-6 kg | 4.0E-6 kg | ||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / Emission to air / unspecified | 7.8E-5 kg | 7.8E-5 kg | ||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / air / unspecified | 2.0E-6 kg | 2.0E-6 kg | ||||||
Elementary flow | Elementary flows / water / unspecified | 3.94E-4 kg | 3.94E-4 kg | ||||||
| |||||||||
Elementary flow | 5.09E-5 kg | 5.09E-5 kg | |||||||
|